Analysis of the Astronomy Diagnostic Test

Brogt, Erik and Sabers, Darrell and Prather, Edward E. and Deming, Grace L. and Hufnagel, Beth and Slater, Timothy F. (2007) Analysis of the Astronomy Diagnostic Test. Astronomy Education Review, 6 (1). ISSN 15391515

[img]
Preview
Text
pgg3ztf3hpn.pdf

Download (106kB) | Preview
Official URL: http://portico.org/stable?au=pgg3ztf9mf7

Abstract

Seventy undergraduate class sections were examined from the database of Astronomy Diagnostic Test (ADT) results of Deming and Hufnagel to determine if course format correlated with ADT normalized gain scores. Normalized gains were calculated for four different classroom scenarios: lecture, lecture with discussion, lecture with lab, and lecture with both lab and discussion. Statistical analysis shows that there are no significant differences in normalized gain among the self-reported classroom formats. Prerequisites related to mathematics courses did show differences in normalized gain. Of all reported course activities, only the lecture and the readings for the course correlate significantly with the normalized gain. This analysis suggests that the ADT may not have enough sensitivity to measure differences in the effectiveness of different course formats because of the wide range of topics that the ADT addresses with few questions. Different measures of gain and their biases are discussed. We argue that the use of the normalized gain is not always warranted because of its strong bias toward high pretest scores.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: Astronomy Education Research
Depositing User: Mr Saeed Salimpour
Date Deposited: 26 Aug 2017 08:07
Last Modified: 19 Aug 2018 09:25
URI: http://istardb.org/id/eprint/998

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item