What Are They Talking About? Lessons Learned from a Study of Peer Instruction

James, Mark C. and Barbieri, Federica and Garcia, Paula (2008) What Are They Talking About? Lessons Learned from a Study of Peer Instruction. Astronomy Education Review, 7 (1). ISSN 15391515

[img]
Preview
Text
pgg3ztf060h.pdf

Download (25kB) | Preview
Official URL: http://portico.org/stable?au=pgg3ztf0c8h

Abstract

Electronic classroom response systems (CRSs) have been in use in large college lectures for over three decades. Such systems are designed to provide instructors and students with immediate statistical analyses of student electronic responses to multiple-choice questions posed to the class by the instructor. The technique known as peer instruction uses a CRS to tabulate student responses after students have had an opportunity to discuss ideas with seat partners. In this study, we investigate recorded peer CRS conversations collected in two introductory astronomy courses over two semesters. Findings suggest that when instructors adopt a high-stakes grading incentive that assigns little credit for incorrect CRS responses rather than providing forums for the spontaneous exploration of nascent ideas, conversations tend to become dominated by a single partner as students attempt to earn maximum credit for a correct answer. We also present a comparison of two methods for studying conversation bias in peer instruction discourse that could be valuable to other researchers interested in studying peer discourse.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: Astronomy Education Research
Depositing User: Mr Saeed Salimpour
Date Deposited: 20 Sep 2017 12:13
Last Modified: 19 Aug 2018 09:25
URI: http://istardb.org/id/eprint/1010

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item