Is Content All That Important?

Sudol, Jeffrey J. (2003) Is Content All That Important? Astronomy Education Review, 2 (2). ISSN 15391515

[img]
Preview
Text
pgg3ztf2r19.pdf

Download (18kB) | Preview
Official URL: http://portico.org/stable?au=pgg3ztf7vpr

Abstract

Although the discussion on what students should learn does contain a mix of comments regarding course goals, instructional methods, methods of assessment, and the results of education research, content dominates the discussion in a way that might give the reader the sense that content is the most important component of a course. Outside this particular discussion, in course descriptions, in discussions about courses with other instructors, and in particular, during job interviews, I also find that content dominates. I want to emphasize here that content alone does not constitute a course. The content is just one component of a course and far less important than the course goals. I want to shift the emphasis in this discussion from course content to course goals, and to that end, I want to make two recommendations regarding course goals: (1) instructors should establish course goals that are independent of content and address the question, “why teach this course?” and (2) instructors should share both their course goals and the measurable student outcomes derived from those goals with their students. To augment these recommendations, I also want to comment on the topic of student misconceptions, which has received a lot of attention in this discussion on what students should learn.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: Astronomy Education Research
Depositing User: Mr Saeed Salimpour
Date Deposited: 22 Sep 2017 05:08
Last Modified: 19 Aug 2018 09:25
URI: http://istardb.org/id/eprint/1050

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item